A Voting League

I had an idea, although I’m uncertain how feasible it would be.  The idea would be to create a voting league, or what would essentially be a candidate-less political party.

Membership would be completely voluntary, but members would pledge to vote for the choice of the league as a whole, irrespective of their own wishes.  The decision of the league would be determined by either an internal vote or by the decision of a guiding body, although I believe an internal vote would be the preferable method.

The goal would be to form a large bloc of voters that could be counted on to vote together, thereby turning themselves into a group that would need to be catered to by political candidates.

I feel that one large problem for people in elections is that they feel that their votes don’t matter.  This would attempt to solve that problem through creating a union of voters.  Maybe you feel that your one vote doesn’t matter, but what if you were assured that a hundred thousand other voices would join yours when you voted?  It might help eliminate some of the electoral apathy currently plaguing us.

As for the goal of the league itself, I think it would be best to focus on a particular issue that has bipartisan support.  A league focused on, for example, the elimination of the estate tax would probably just vote Republican anyway, without any special effort devoted towards it.  A bipartisan issue might bring together people who might otherwise vote for either party, which would make its votes more important in an election.  I feel that something easily measurable would be best, something like “separation of church and state” would be preferable to “freedom,” for example.

There are a number of issues, though.  Firstly, you can’t verify how any member votes.  You’d simply hope they actually follow the league’s decision.  Secondly, unless you limited membership in some way, it would be extremely easy to infiltrate and sabotage, if the decision of the league were to be decided my internal vote, which is one argument in favor of a guiding council, instead.

If done well, though, you could hopefully gather together a large number of people who care about a particular issue, but just feel that they can’t get politicians to listen to them individually.  You’d be essentially unionizing the electorate to get better conditions.  Voter turnout has been below 65% for a long time in the US.  Even a small increase could make a large impact.  The logistics would probably be difficult, but if you could make it work, the benefits would be worth it.

This entry was posted in Ideas and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to A Voting League

  1. utahrob says:

    You may get some ideas by researching the GAR ( Grand Army of the Republic). They were union veterans from the Civil War and controlled politics up into the 1920s. Personally, I think if your vote counted, they probably wouldn’t let you do it. I find all current ideologies are based on half-truths. Money rules what you get exposed to in the media. If you don’t seek out the whole truth and let pundits tell you what to think, you wind up so far removed from common sense that there’s no finding your way back.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.